Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Fri Mar 23 2001 - 18:56:12 EST

Next message: Tim Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Previous message: Nigel Gamble: "Re: Use semaphore for producer/consumer case..."
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings"
Next in thread: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Is there a non-written standard for coding that asm's ?
> For example:
> " adcl 12(%1), %0\n"
> "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n"
> " lea 4(%1), %1\n"
>
> or
>
> "adcl 12(%1), %0\n\t"
^[1]
> "1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n\t"
> "lea 4(%1), %1\n\t"

The first one is better readable and the latter one is more
portable (since the first may contain tabs in the string, instead
of spaces and no one sees this).

You'll see, what I mean with readable, if you omit the tab in [1].

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<     been there and had much fun   >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Wright: "Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init"
Previous message: Nigel Gamble: "Re: Use semaphore for producer/consumer case..."
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings"
Next in thread: Bill Wendling: "Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:22 EST