Re: Larger dev_t

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Tue Apr 03 2001 - 07:20:24 EST

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Device numbers/names have to be constant in order to detect
> disk layout changes across boots.

Names stay constant, but why the NUMBERS? The names should stay
constant and represent the actual layout on each busses (say:
sane hierachic enumeration) of course.

But /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 could get a new device
number on every reboot, right?

I'm sure, I'm missing some important usage of device of device
numers here (not counting the ones listed already), but I don't
know what ;-)

Otherwise it would be too easy to remove static major/minors and
all the fun allocating them. And LANANA would have one thing less
to worry about ;-)

One thing I certainly miss: DevFS is not mandatory (yet).

Thanks & Regards

Ingo Oeser 

-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<     been there and had much fun   >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 21:00:12 EST