Re: which gcc version?

From: Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@zmailer.org)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 07:31:45 EST


On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:26:32PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> matti.aarnio@zmailer.org said:
> > To think of it, there really should be explicitely callable
> > versions of these with LinuxKernel names for them, not gcc
> > builtins.  That way people would *know* they are doing
> > something, which is potentially very slow.
> > (And the API would not change from underneath them.)
>
> Like include/asm-*/div64.h::do_div()?

        Like that (*) - but that has limited value spaces,
        the divider can be at most 32 bits, probably far less.

> --
> dwmw2

/Matti Aarnio

(*) Trying to recall when I, and few others, created that beast.
    The divisor code in itself isn't mine, but the idea of supporting
    %Ld at printk() most definitely is..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST