Re: No 100 HZ timer !

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 10 2001 - 07:36:27 EST

Next message: Heusden, Folkert van: "[RFC] FW: proposal for systems that do not require security"
Previous message: Mark Salisbury: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It's also all interrupts, not only syscalls, and also context switch if you
> want to be accurate.

We dont need to be that accurate. Our sample rate is currently so low the
data is worthless anyway

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Heusden, Folkert van: "[RFC] FW: proposal for systems that do not require security"
Previous message: Mark Salisbury: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: No 100 HZ timer !"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:13 EST