On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Comments?
>
> --- fs/inode.c~ Thu Mar 22 16:04:13 2001
> +++ fs/inode.c Thu Apr 12 15:18:22 2001
> @@ -347,6 +347,11 @@
> #endif
>
> spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> + while (inode->i_state & I_LOCK) {
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> + __wait_on_inode(inode);
> + spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> + }
> if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
> goto out;
> if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
Ehh.
Why not just lock the inode around the thing?
The above looks rather ugly.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST