Re: Still cannot compile, 2.4.3-ac6

From: John Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2001 - 19:02:34 EST

Next message: George Bonser: "2.4 stable when?"
Previous message: Stefan Becker: "Re: RealTek 8139 driver updated, tested requested"
In reply to: Marko Kreen: "Re: Still cannot compile, 2.4.3-ac6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Marko Kreen wrote:

> Sorry. Who said it should not be tested? How else it could get
> 'default compiler'? If the gcc-3.0 would start giving errors
> on some old code then it could be gcc bug. But this rwsem code
> is couple of days old. It is good to let it through stricter
> error checking, I guess. This rwsem is very in-flux code. eg.
> 2.4.4-pre2 did not compile. ac[56] with um-arch do not compile.

For what its worth, I got the same error on 2.4.3-ac5, using gcc 2.91.66.

I did seem messages fly by in on the list about a few in -ac5, but
haven't gone back to dig them out.

-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George Bonser: "2.4 stable when?"
Previous message: Stefan Becker: "Re: RealTek 8139 driver updated, tested requested"
In reply to: Marko Kreen: "Re: Still cannot compile, 2.4.3-ac6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:23 EST