Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Previous message: Matthew W. Lowe: "Re: 2.4.3 - Module problems?"
• In reply to: Swivel: "small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Swivel wrote:
>
> drivers/char/char.c, line 247
> create_proc_read_entry() is called regardless of the definition of
> CONFIG_PROC_FS, simply wrap call with #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS and #endif.

create_proc_read_entry exists, as a static inline no-op, without
CONFIG_PROC_FS.

Typically you want to change the driver-local function passed to
create_proc_read_entry to be a static inline no-op for the
!CONFIG_PROC_FS case.

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | "Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Teach a
Building 1024     |  man to fish, and a US Navy submarine will make sure
MandrakeSoft      |  he's never hungry again." -- Chris Neufeld
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Previous message: Matthew W. Lowe: "Re: 2.4.3 - Module problems?"
• In reply to: Swivel: "small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: small bug/oversight found in 2.4.3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:24 EST