>
>
> George, while this is needed as pointed out in a previous message,
> due to non-contiguous physical IDs, I think the current usage is
> pretty bad (at least looking from a x86 perspective). Maybe somebody
> can chime in from a different architecture.
>
> I think that all data accesses particularly to __aligned_data
> should be performed through logical ids. There's a lot of remapping
> going on, due to the mix of logical and physical IDs.
>
I _think_ cpu_logical_map() can be deleted from the kernel, and all
places that use it can just use the [0 ... (smp_num_cpus-1)] number.
This is for the generic kernel code. The only place that should need
to convert from this number space to a "physical" space would be the
intercpu interrupt code (arch specific code).
Only a handful of architectures (mips64, sparc*, alpha) do array
lookups for cpu_logical_map() anyway, those probably can be changed
to the x86 definition of cpu_logical_map().
Kanoj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:24 EST