On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > OK, now I know what's happening, the next question is, what should be
> > dones about it. If anything.
>
> [ discovered by alexey on #kernelnewbies ]
>
> One thing we should do is make sure the buffer cache code sets
> the referenced bit on pages, so we don't recycle buffer cache
> pages early.
>
> This should leave more space for the buffercache and lead to us
> reclaiming the (now unused) space in the dentry cache instead...
Sorry, but that's just plain wrong. We shouldn't keep inode table in
buffer-cache at all. And we should be more aggressive on icache -
dcache looks sane now (recent 2.4.4-pre), but icache holds unused
inodes for too long. And freeing them is very slow _and_ random -
recipe for kmem_cache fragmentation.
/me sits down to port inode-table-in-pagecache to 2.4.4-pre4...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST