Bob McElrath wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik [jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com] wrote:
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Which does boil down to having to work with trees other than Linus or
> > > Alans. Remember, the official tree is not always the up-to-date tree,
> > > or in the case of other arches, the most relevant tree.
> >
> > Yep. You could even look at Linus as simply the x86 port maintainer :)
> >
> > Except for alpha and x86, AFAIK, most people wind up going through
> > arch-specific channels to get their kernels...
>
> This may be a dumb question, but is there some place where the arch
> maintainers are listed? Where the arch-specific trees are kept? Where
> would I go to get the latest set of relevant patches for alpha?
As I noted in the e-mail to which you replied, there is no separate
alpha tree nor arch-specific channel for alpha kernels. Generally fixes
to the Alpha tree appear quickly and get merged quickly, and the tree
stays in sync quite well. Watch linux-kernel or Alan Cox's patchkit for
Alpha fixes that may be in transmit to Linus.
There are of course RedHat's alpha distro, and various mailing lists on
http://www.alphalinux.org/
--
Jeff Garzik | The difference between America and England is that
Building 1024 | the English think 100 miles is a long distance and
MandrakeSoft | the Americans think 100 years is a long time.
| (random fortune)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:37 EST