okay, testing will begin monday (when it's under load).
any advice on which value i begin with ? (20 ?)
François Cami
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Francois Cami wrote:
> >
> > Vibol Hou wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > Apr 17 16:10:12 omega kernel: eth0: Too much work in interrupt, status e401.
> >
> > I got that one too, PC is ASUS P2B-DS with two PII-350, 384MB RAM,
> > 3C905B.
>
> If you were getting this message occasionally, and if increasing the
> max_interrupt_work module parm makes it stop, and everything
> is always working fine, then it's an OK thing to do.
>
> Question is: why is it happening? We're failing to get out
> of the interrupt loop after 32 loops. Each loop can reap
> up to 16 transmitted packets and 32 received packets.
> That's a lot.
>
> My suspicion is that something else in the system is
> causing the NIC interrupt routine to get held up for long
> periods of time. It has to be another interrupt.
>
> All reporters of this problem (ie: both of them) were using
> aic7xx SCSI. I wonder if that driver can sometimes spend a
> long time in its interrupt routine. Many times. Rapidly.
>
> Very odd.
>
> Ah. SMP. Perhaps the other CPU is generating the transmit
> load, some other interrupt source is slowing down *this*
> CPU.
>
> Could you test something for me? Try *decreasing* the
> value of max_interrupt_work. See if that increases
> the frequency of the message. Then, it if does, try to
> correlate the occurence of the message with some other
> form of system activity (especially disk I/O).
>
> Thanks.
>
> -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:39 EST