Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Mon Apr 23 2001 - 23:59:15 EST

Next message: alad@hss.hns.com: "Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Has the iptables security patch been vetted?"
Next in thread: Stephen Satchell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Maybe reply: Stephen Satchell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <3AE449A3.3050601@eisenstein.dk> you write:
> return (waitall ? len : min(sk->rcvlowat, len)) ? : 1;
>
> To be strictly correct the second expression (between '?' and ':' )
> should not be omitted (all you guys already know that ofcourse).

It's a GCC extension. From Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl:

GNU Extensions are explicitly allowed in the Linux kernel.

Rusty.

--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: alad@hss.hns.com: "Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Has the iptables security patch been vetted?"
Next in thread: Stephen Satchell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Maybe reply: Stephen Satchell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST