Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

From: Mohammad A. Haque (mhaque@haque.net)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 07:33:41 EST

Next message: imel96@trustix.co.id: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: __alloc_pages: 4-order allocation failed"
In reply to: imel96@trustix.co.id: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

imel96@trustix.co.id wrote:
> i'd be happy to accept proof that multi-user is a solution for
> clueless user, not because it's proven on servers. but because it is
> a solution by definition.

Clueless user deletes files critical to running the system. '!@#$% Why
can't I boot. Oh my gosh!! Linux sucks!'

-- 
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net
  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: imel96@trustix.co.id: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: __alloc_pages: 4-order allocation failed"
In reply to: imel96@trustix.co.id: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Single user linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:15 EST