Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch fixes both. It is against 2.4.4, but from the looks
> > of it it should patch against -ac as well.
>
> Btw, please use "static inline" instead of "extern inline", as gcc may
> decide not to inline the latter at all, leading to confusing link-time
> errors. (Gcc may also decide not to inline "static inline", but then gcc
> will output the actual body of the function out-of-line if it gets used,
> so you don't get the link-time failure).
>
> Right now only certain broken versions of gcc will actually show this
> behaviour, I think, but it's at least in theory going to be an issue.
>
I guess I personally prefer an error over completely broken behaviour,
but feel free to change it.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:09 EST