Re: Requirement of make oldconfig [was: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka ...]

• Next message: David Bronaugh: "Breakage of opl3sax cards since 2.4.3 (at least)"
• Previous message: David: "Re: * Re: Severe trashing in 2.4.4"
• In reply to: Olivier Galibert: "Re: Requirement of make oldconfig [was: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka ...]"
• Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Requirement of make oldconfig [was: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka ...]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:31:12PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > You are proposing an interface that will handle easy cases but blow
> > up in the user's face in any hard one. That's poor design, frustrating
> > the user exactly when he/she most needs help.
>
> Yeah, but what is the current method, vi?

If you edit a .config (current or CML2'ed) and fix a problem, it works.
What was the question again? (And, if you edit an old .config, %s/^# CONFIG/CONFIG and %s/ is not set/=n, oldconfig works like you would expect, and can help
point out places where CML2 is slightly off).

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David Bronaugh: "Breakage of opl3sax cards since 2.4.3 (at least)"
• Previous message: David: "Re: * Re: Severe trashing in 2.4.4"
• In reply to: Olivier Galibert: "Re: Requirement of make oldconfig [was: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka ...]"
• Next in thread: Horst von Brand: "Re: Requirement of make oldconfig [was: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 1.3.1, aka ...]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:11 EST