Re: Broken gcc ?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 06:48:32 EST

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [Patch] deadlock on write in tmpfs"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: ioctl call for network device"
In reply to: Amarendra GODBOLE: "Broken gcc ?"
Next in thread: Michael Stiller: "Re: Broken gcc ?"
Reply: Michael Stiller: "Re: Broken gcc ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If I recall correctly, RHL 7 shipped with a broken gcc. Has it been
> fixed ? Basically, is it safe to switch to RHL 7 for development
> purposes ? Presently I use RHL 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel.

I do all my kernel development with gcc 2.96-69 and 2.96-81 (the errata
7.0 and the 7.1 gcc).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [Patch] deadlock on write in tmpfs"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: ioctl call for network device"
In reply to: Amarendra GODBOLE: "Broken gcc ?"
Next in thread: Michael Stiller: "Re: Broken gcc ?"
Reply: Michael Stiller: "Re: Broken gcc ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:13 EST