Re: [Re: Could clock granularity be increased????]

From: shreenivasa H V (shreenihv@usa.net)
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 16:08:47 EST


I though about that. Would it affect other kernel modules which assume the
value of HZ (to be 100)? But for this, I guess increasing the value of HZ to
1000 or so should work. Are u sure it is ok to increase HZ?

Sam Coles <sam@bcinet.net> wrote:
Will editing include/asm/param.h not do the trick?

Sam

On 05 May 2001 12:53:14 -0500, shreenivasa H V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way I could use a clock granularity of less than 10ms if I
need
> to do some hacking of the kernel TCP code? Ideally I would require the
> interval of the order of 10-100 microseconds.
> thanks,
> shreeni.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST