Tobias Ringstrom writes:
> But is it really specified in the C "standards" to be exctly zero or one,
> and not zero and non-zero?
I'm pretty sure it does.
> IMHO, the ?: construct is way more readable and reliable.
Well identical code has been there for several months just a few lines
away.
I've seen this idiom used in many places (even the GCC sources :-),
so I'm rather surprised people are seeing it for the first time.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST