Re: Wow! Is memory ever cheap!

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 16:29:33 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Previous message: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: Wow! Is memory ever cheap!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:

> For the record, however, I never stated that BitKeeper is a
> memory hog, that's a conclusion you drew.

I read it that way in your message, but it's good to have
the situation clarified ;)

Rik

-- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] zero^H^H^H^Hsingle copy pipe"
Previous message: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: Wow! Is memory ever cheap!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:26 EST