Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

From: Eric S. Raymond (esr@thyrsus.com)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 20:56:18 EST


Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>:
> Only sort-of. There are some cases where you can get away with that.
> Probably. eg If you ask for PARPORT, on x86 that means yes to PARPORT_PC,
> always (right?)

Yes. So the right answer there isn't to use a derivation but to say:

require X86 and PARPORT implies PARPORT_PC
unless X86==n suppress PARPORT_PC

which forces PARPORT_PC==y and makes the question invisible on X86 machines,
but leaves the question visible on all others.

-- 
		<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

The real point of audits is to instill fear, not to extract revenue; the IRS aims at winning through intimidation and (thereby) getting maximum voluntary compliance -- Paul Strassel, former IRS Headquarters Agent Wall St. Journal 1980 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:26 EST