tmpfs + sendfile bug ?

From: Pierre Etchemaite (petchema@concept-micro.com)
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 11:35:53 EST

Next message: Mohammad A. Haque: "Re: Giant disk on 2.2.17: Any concerns?"
Previous message: Harald Dunkel: "Giant disk on 2.2.17: Any concerns?"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Maybe reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,

I just found a problem GETting a file stored in tmpfs using proftpd; I always
get a "426 Transfer aborted. Data connection closed."

That could be a bug with tmpfs and sendfile in 2.4.5-pre4 :

[...]
read(8, "%PDF-1.4\r%\342\343\317\323\r\n870 0 obj\r<< \r/L"..., 8192) = 8192
shmat(11, 0x4cfe65, 0x3) = 0xbffff4d4
sendfile(11, 8, [0], 5045861) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
[...]

Any idea ?

Best regards,
Pierre.

-- 
We are the dot in 0.2 Kb/s
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mohammad A. Haque: "Re: Giant disk on 2.2.17: Any concerns?"
Previous message: Harald Dunkel: "Giant disk on 2.2.17: Any concerns?"
Next in thread: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Reply: David Schwartz: "RE: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Maybe reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:42 EST