Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 23:25:16 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "[PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Locking rules: both require mount_sem and dcache_lock being
> held by callers.
>

It would help a lot if locking rules were commented in
the source, rather than on linux-kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "[PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "[PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] (part 2) fs/super.c cleanups"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:50 EST