> I did not realize that syncppp does not implement
> all the RFC1661 states. That's simply broken :(
> A proper state machine implementation would be nice.
syncppp.c -predates- RFC1661 I believe.
> On the other hand, it works in a minimal way
> for most people and it's supposed to be folded
> into the generic PPP implementation someday.
> So there's not much point in trying to overhaul the code.
I had hoped for 2.4 to use generic ppp with it. That might be the more
productive way to attack the problem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:00:18 EST