Reg:usage of insmod

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
• Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
• In reply to: SATHISH.J: "Reg ramfs mkfs"
• Next in thread: Jaswinder Singh: "Re: Reg:usage of insmod"
• Reply: Jaswinder Singh: "Re: Reg:usage of insmod"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,

Sorry for disturbing you with my doubt.

I tried to insert a module(my own object file called dssp.o) into the
running kernel and i got the following:

[root@juhie fs]# insmod -o ./dssp.o -f dssp
Using /lib/modules/2.2.14-12/fs/dssp.o
/lib/modules/2.2.14-12/fs/dssp.o: couldn't find the kernel version the
module was compiled for

I could not make out why this error message came. Please help me out with
this.

Thanks in advance

regards,
sathish

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
• Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)"
• In reply to: SATHISH.J: "Reg ramfs mkfs"
• Next in thread: Jaswinder Singh: "Re: Reg:usage of insmod"
• Reply: Jaswinder Singh: "Re: Reg:usage of insmod"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:00:23 EST