Re: accounting for threads

From: J . A . Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2001 - 09:57:38 EST

Next message: Simone Piunno: "PROBLEM: compiling with gcc 3.0"
Previous message: Dan Kegel: "re: accounting for threads"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "re: accounting for threads"
Next in thread: ognen@gene.pbi.nrc.ca: "re: accounting for threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 20010619 Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>Let me know if this helps. And anyone else, let me know if there's a simpler
>way to do this. Should LinuxThreads be doing this under the hood, so it can
>be a little closer to posix threads compliance?
>- Dan

He, I have just discovered that IRIX 6.2 times(2) also fails to account time for
threads. 6.4 works fine.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Linux Mandrake release 8.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.5-ac15 #2 SMP Sun Jun 17 02:12:45 CEST 2001 i686
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Simone Piunno: "PROBLEM: compiling with gcc 3.0"
Previous message: Dan Kegel: "re: accounting for threads"
In reply to: Dan Kegel: "re: accounting for threads"
Next in thread: ognen@gene.pbi.nrc.ca: "re: accounting for threads"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 21:00:23 EST