Re: GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code!

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2001 - 18:19:06 EST

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: [PATCH] catch potential null derefs in drivers/char/ip2main.c (245ac16)"
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: Some experience of linux on a Laptop"
In reply to: Alexander V. Bilichenko: "GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code!"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 25 June 2001 00:44, Alexander V. Bilichenko wrote:
> Hello All!
> Some tests that I have recently check out.
> kernel compiled with 3.0 (2.4.5) function call: 1000000 iteration. 3%
> slower than 2.95.
> test example - hash table add/remove - 4% slower (compiled both
> with -O2 -march=i686).
> Why have this version been released?
> Best regards,
> Alexander mailto:dmor@7ka.mipt.ru

Err, thanks for the benchmarks, but how does this qualify as 'really' slower?

Disassemblies of the inner loops would be very informative.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: [PATCH] catch potential null derefs in drivers/char/ip2main.c (245ac16)"
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: Some experience of linux on a Laptop"
In reply to: Alexander V. Bilichenko: "GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code!"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST