Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2001 - 18:50:24 EST

Next message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: Rob Landley: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:30:02AM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> They use fork().
> They port their app to solaris.
> The performance sucks.
> It is not Solaris fault.
> It is linux fast fork() ...

One for the quotes page, eh? We're terribly sorry, we'll get busy on adding
some delay loops in Linux so it too can be slow.

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: Rob Landley: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST