Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)

From: Gerhard Mack (gmack@innerfire.net)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2001 - 19:32:46 EST

Next message: Jeff Dike: "Re: Microsoft and Xenix."
Previous message: Jeff Chua: "Re: replay on read-only filesystem"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> BTW, after all I have read all POSIX threads library should be no more than
> a wrapper over fork(), clone and so on. Why are they so bad then ?
> I am going to get glibc source to see what is inside pthread_create...

If I recall it had to do with problems in signal delivery...

-- Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Dike: "Re: Microsoft and Xenix."
Previous message: Jeff Chua: "Re: replay on read-only filesystem"
In reply to: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Next in thread: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Reply: Davide Libenzi: "Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST