Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

From: Christoph Zens (czens@coactive.com)
Date: Thu Jun 28 2001 - 13:17:15 EST

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] User chroot"
Previous message: Ho Chak Hung: "Is an outside module supposed to use page cache?"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Next in thread: Daniel Stone: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Reply: Daniel Stone: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Also, in printk's, you waste run-time memory, and you bloat up the need
> for the log size. Both of which are _technical_ reasons not to do it.
>
> Small is beuatiful.

I totally agree. If you want to use Linux for a small and low cost
embedded system, you can't afford loads of RAM and FLASH space.
Small is the _key_ for those systems.

>
> Linus
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@axis.com
>

-- Christoph Zens czens@coactive.com (415)-289-7765

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] User chroot"
Previous message: Ho Chak Hung: "Is an outside module supposed to use page cache?"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Next in thread: Daniel Stone: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Reply: Daniel Stone: "Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:00:20 EST