Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > that the expected lifespan for 32 bit systems is now less than 3 years, so
> > > elaborate planning that delays implementation buys us nothing more than a
> > > smaller window of usefulness.
> > Maybe by then only 64-bit cpus will matter. Who knows.
>
> Reality check.
>
> Embedded PCI 32bit processors are going to be very common
> People are only now retiring 486's
>
> So add another seven or eight years to your estimate
Given a little more context, I thought we were talking specifically
about 64bit-PCI-on-32bit-machines?
Assuming that, AFAICS Ben's statement seems more correct.
And IMHO we definitely should not optimize for 64-bit-on-32-bit case.
Let CONFIG_HIGHMEM grow dma_addr_t to 64-bits, for that case only...
-- Jeff Garzik | A recent study has shown that too much soup Building 1024 | can cause malaise in laboratory mice. MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:20 EST