Sampsa Ranta writes:
> Pardon me, bugs come in too easy..
>
> - vci != ATM_VCI_ANY && vci >> dev->ci_range.vci_bits))
> + vci != ATM_VCI_ANY && vci >= 1 << dev->ci_range.vci_bits))
>
This is rediculious, why has this expression changed when right
above it is the same thing:
vpi >> dev->ci_range.vpi_bits) || (vci != ATM_VCI_UNSPEC &&
Shouldn't we be changing that "vpi >> dev->ci_range.vpi_bits" boolean
test as well?
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:29 EST