Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 03:10:07 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O"
Previous message: Eric Lammerts: "Re: [PATCH] oom killer killing all threads"
In reply to: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Next in thread: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Reply: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 16 2001, Hisaaki Shibata wrote:
> I got many warnings. but I dare send this.
>
> I hope it will be your help and mine.

I don't have the -ac[5] tree handy, in the 2.4.9-pre4 there's no BUG in
get_empty_inode(). For DVD-RAM + UDF, I would suggest using the version
from CVS. I know it quite recently got some fixes that removed a BUG or
two when used with the -ac kernels.

So could you reproduce with latest -ac or Linus kernel + CVS UDF?
Thanks.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O"
Previous message: Eric Lammerts: "Re: [PATCH] oom killer killing all threads"
In reply to: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Next in thread: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Reply: Hisaaki Shibata: "Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:14 EST