Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)
From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 05:29:05 EST
- Next message: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Previous message: Sergey Tzukanov: "[ANNOUNCE][RFC][TESTING] new QNX4 fs implementation with write support"
- In reply to: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Maybe reply: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Reply: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Reply: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:17:46PM +0200, christophe barbé wrote:
> > asmlinkage long sys_nanosleep(struct timespec *rqtp, struct timespec
> > *rmtp)
> > {
> > struct timespec t;
> > unsigned long expire;
> > + struct pt_regs * regs = (struct pt_regs *) &rqtp;
Note also that this is bogus as an architecture invariant.
On ARM, we have to pass a pt_regs pointer into any function that requires
it.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Previous message: Sergey Tzukanov: "[ANNOUNCE][RFC][TESTING] new QNX4 fs implementation with write support"
- In reply to: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Maybe reply: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Reply: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Reply: christophe barbé: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:15 EST