Hi,
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> The cast in the new version is not dumb, it's smart.
Yes, it's the smart version of "min((type)a, (type)b)"...
> It's the programmer saying (to both the reader of the
> code and the compiler) "I want this comparison to use
> type X". Period.
Why? Why would anyone want this? Do you need this for any other ordinary
compare? (For which the compiler will also generate "dumb" warnings.)
> There is no ambiguity, there are no multiple-evaluation
> issues, and no dumb warnings from the compiler.
I'm all for fixing the multiple-evaluation, but I don't see why this
warning should be dumb. If you don't like it, use "-Wno-sign-compare".
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST