Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:40:35 EST

Next message: Ricky Beam: "Re: Qlogic/FC firmware"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Filling holes in ext2"
In reply to: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
Reply: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:56:31PM -0700, george anzinger wrote:
> Uh..? I though that was what I was allowing. It seems to me to be a
> lot of extra work to put the same code in 15 different archs.
> Especially if one does not really know each of them, nor can any one
> group (or individual) be expected to be able to test (or even have the
> hardware to test) each of them.

Umm, my best advice is to look at sys_fork() and do_fork(), sys_execve()
and do_execve().

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ricky Beam: "Re: Qlogic/FC firmware"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Filling holes in ext2"
In reply to: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
Reply: george anzinger: "Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:00:50 EST