Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 14:22:08 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Filling holes in ext2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: macro conflict"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Next in thread: Roland Bauerschmidt: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Look, either you implement CML2 in C (it can be done; but I'd wager it
> isn't easy), or you pay someone else to do it, _or_ you stop complaining.

It probably isnt very hard. Its not hard for example to knock up the needed
C code to do proper rule validation from CML1 in 2.4

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Filling holes in ext2"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: macro conflict"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Next in thread: Roland Bauerschmidt: "Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:01:01 EST