Re: ram device not initialised to zero in 2.4.8

• Next message: Tony Hoyle: "Re: File System Limitations"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: assembler -> linux system calls"
• In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "ram device not initialised to zero in 2.4.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:53:43PM +0200, Peter T. Breuer merrily said:
> I don't see what harm it does, but the ram devices are full of
> interesting data if you read them after setting them up. Either
> this is a security hole waiting to happen, or somebody is being
> very inventive with the fill ...

Well. It would probably be the first possibility. I tried out what you
said, and it showed me the contents of a mail which I had just sent
out ...

- Sandip

-- 
-------------------------------------
Sandip Bhattacharya 
sandipb @ bigfoot.com
http://www.sandipb.net
-------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Tony Hoyle: "Re: File System Limitations"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: assembler -> linux system calls"
• In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "ram device not initialised to zero in 2.4.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 21:01:03 EST