Re: 2.4 broken on 486SX

From: Brian Gerst (bgerst@didntduck.org)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 15:37:04 EST


Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> Ack, that was a horrific problem report. Here are a few relevant data points I left out:
>
> Kernels have always been compiled only with 386 optimizations.
> (tried 486 a few times, no difference)
> Always built including soft float support (not that it matters so early)
> Always built with gcc 2.95.2
> Same kernel binaries work perfectly on a number of other boxen:
> A 386DX, a number of Pentium 100's, another 486SX, and a K6-2

What was the last known working kernel for this machine? Have you tried
any -ac kernels?

--

Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:14 EST