Re: Poor Performance for ethernet bonding

From: Henning P. Schmiedehausen (mailgate@hometree.net)
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 02:40:19 EST

Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:

>On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On the surface, multi-path routing sounds complicated to me, while
>> layer-2 bonding seems relatively trivial to set up/administer. Since we do
>> support bonding, if it's a simple fix to make it better, we
>> might as well do that, eh?

>multipath routing is really not complicated; I don't know why it "sounds"
>complicated to you. Of course you could always add new features to the kernel
>because the existing ones which do the same thing in a better way
>"sound complicated" to someone; I doubt it is a good use of developer time
>however.

But it is still the wrong layer.

Ethernet Bonding ist "below" IP. Very handy if you want to run
something "not ip".

        Regards
                Henning 

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen       -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH     hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22  Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0   info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof     Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:22 EST