On Fri, Aug 31 2001, Jonathan Lahr wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> Please elaborate on "no, no, no". Are you suggesting that no further
> improvements can be made or should be attempted on the 2.4 i/o subsystem?
Of course not. The no no no just means that attempting to globally remove the
io_request_lock at this point is a no-go, so don't even go there. The
sledgehammer approach will not fly at this point, it's just way too risky.
Jens
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:35 EST