Samium Gromoff wrote:
>
> ANdreas Dilger wrote:
> > Win2K even abstracts all SMP/UP code into a module (the HAL) and loads this
> > at boot, thus using the same kernel for both.
> the only possibility of this shows how ugly is SMP in win2k...
> this is a situation where they are or geniuses or idiots.
> MS never proved to be geniuses so they still are idiots...
>
Did someone any benchmarking?
I expect the loss of performance per application a none issue.
What do you think: >0.5%?
Are you considering interrupt latency in the first place?
Then obviously BeOS is also engineered from idiots...
Oh, and QNX/RTP has separate kernels for UP/SMP. And they
don't need UP/SMP versions of "modules".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:11 EST