Re: is bzImage container large enough?

From: Mike Castle (dalgoda@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Sat Sep 01 2001 - 15:42:29 EST

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [RFC] lazy allocation of struct block_device"
Previous message: Lukas Beeler: "Re: Excessive TCP retransmits over lossless, high latency link"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 06:29:41AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> allmod and make randconfig. Included in separate mail.

randconfig?

This scares me. :->

Btw, are such things independent of CML being used? Was wondering if a
"randconfig" might use CML2 to validate the configuration (as far as CML2
knows about it). _Might_ be useful to enhance CML2 to track down
incompatible configurations.

mrc

-- 
     Mike Castle      dalgoda@ix.netcom.com      www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [RFC] lazy allocation of struct block_device"
Previous message: Lukas Beeler: "Re: Excessive TCP retransmits over lossless, high latency link"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: is bzImage container large enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:13 EST