>> I think, perhaps, the logic should be that a module
>> shouldn't taint the kernel if:
>>
>> 1) The user built the module from source on that machine, OR
>>
>> 2) The module source is freely available without restriction
>
> I just realized two things. One, there's a strong argument that this
> should be an AND, not an OR.
And as all distributions would fail (1) in initial form, all
distributions would result in tainted kernels. Is this the
intent?
-- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:30 EST