Re: linux-2.4.10-pre5

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Sep 09 2001 - 07:09:53 EST


On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> It's only filesystems that have modified buffers without marking them
> dirty (by virtue of having pointers to buffers and delaying the dirtying
> until later) that are broken by the "try to make sure all buffers are
> up-to-date by reading them in" approach.

Think of the inode and dentry caches. I guess we need
some way to invalidate those.

Rik

--
IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST