Hello Petr,
Saturday, September 15, 2001, 10:16:59 AM, you wrote:
PV> Hi,
PV> I'll sleep much better with ...
>> +static void __init pci_fixup_athlon_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
>> +{
>> + u8 v;
>> + printk("Trying to stomp on Athlon bug...\n");
>> + pci_read_config_byte(d, 0x55, &v);
PV>+ if (v & 0x80) {
>> + v &= 0x7f; /* clear bit 55.7 */
>> + pci_write_config_byte(d, 0x55, v);
PV>+ }
How about this:
+static void __init pci_fixup_athlon_bug(struct pci_dev *d)
+{
+ u8 v;
+ pci_read_config_byte(d, 0x55, &v);
+ if(v & 0x80) {
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "Stomping on Athlon bug.\n");
+ v &= 0x7f; /* clear bit 55.7 */
+ pci_write_config_byte(d, 0x55, v);
+ }
+}
Well, these are cosmetic changes anyway...
What is more important now:
1) Do we have people who still see Athlon bug with the patch?
2) Do Alan read these messages? ;-)
-- Best regards, VDA mailto:VDA@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua http://port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua/vda/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 15 2001 - 21:00:48 EST