Hi.
>>Which means that the "statistical sampling" is very skewed by
>>self-selection, and anybody who knows anything about statistics knows
>>that sample selection is _very_ important.
>>
> the only way it'll get a good sampling is to put it in the kernel
> I suggest not adding this to the "athlon" cpu selection code. Rather make it
> a sub-option like many other drivers have. That way people can select
> whether they need it or not until we are sure it's totally safe for everyone
> to use it by Via saying so or something. Just a suggestion, other drivers
> do the same thing, so why not the cpu selection screen for workarounds.
Why not simply add it to the next -pre cycle (if 2.4.10 is nearby), ie
2.4.11-pre1 has it, it goes through a few revisions of -pre and if it's
stable enough for mainstream, have it standard for 2.4.11, otherwise
just drop it, fix it, squash it, or do whatever with it :)
And if 2.4.10 isn't that close, add it to -pre13 and do the same, having
it permanently in 2.4.10 (or not if it's nuclear).
// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:31 EST