On 19 Sep 01 at 19:55, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Ok but that part is simple:
>
> run
>
> http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/athlon.c
Small question - is it OK that 'faster_copy' is faster than
'even_faster'? By only few percents, but... It is dual cpu Tyan,
with two AMD MP 1.2MHz, with 1022:700C AMD hostbridge. I'll
check KT133 at home if I'll remember...
Thanks,
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $
clear_page() tests
clear_page function 'warm up run' took 13967 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 9298 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 9284 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 8508 cycles per page
clear_page function 'faster_clear_page' took 4016 cycles per page
clear_page function 'even_faster_clear' took 3916 cycles per page
copy_page() tests
copy_page function 'warm up run' took 15118 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX' took 17002 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback' took 16978 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version' took 15163 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy' took 8569 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster' took 8805 cycles per page
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:32 EST