Re: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2001 - 00:05:02 EST


On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:43:57PM -0500, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
> Sorry, bad editing, that should be:
>
> Assume a large but bursty current of low bandwidth
> high latency connections instead of a continuous steady
> flood of high bandwidth low latency connections.

Isn't asynchronous io a better model for that case?

                -ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:36 EST