On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On September 20, 2001 12:04 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Reverse mappings make linear aging easier to do but are not critical (we
> > can walk all physical pages via the page map array).
>
> But you can't pick up the referenced bit that way, so no up aging,
> only down.
That still doesn't mean we can't _approximate_ aging in
another way. With linear page aging (3 up, 1 down) the
page ages of pages referenced only in the page tables
will still go up, albeit a tad slower than expected.
It's exponential aging which makes the page age go into
the other direction, with linear aging things seem to
work again.
I've done some experiments recently and found that (with
reverse mappings) exponential aging is faster when we have
a small inactive list and linear aging is faster when we
have a large inactive list.
This means we need linear page aging with a large inactive
list in order to let the page ages move into the right
direction when we run a system without reverse mapping,
the patch for that was sent to Alan yesterday.
regards,
Rik
-- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:37 EST