Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2001 - 21:29:25 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: 2.4.9-ac12 weird mc hang"
In reply to: Roger Larsson: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Roger Larsson wrote:

> > > The yield we do in __alloc_pages is it really correct?

> > > I have to try...
>
> Unexpected result, but interesting.
> Things got MUCH WORSE!

Not at all unexpected, this thing has been tested
extensively in the 2.4.0-test* kernels.

Is it really so hard to learn from the past if it's
more than 6 weeks ago ?

regards,

Rik

-- IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: 2.4.9-ac12 weird mc hang"
In reply to: Roger Larsson: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Next in thread: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:41 EST